Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Stuff

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

Agreement is nearly universal that leadership can be learned. If leadership means being an executive, then there are clearly...

Our efforts to explain leadership are like the proverbial blind men trying to understand an elephant by merely feeling its...

Leadership’s hostile takeover of management’s role in the 1980’s has been a disaster. Efforts to separate...

It's time to stop talking about leaders and managers and focus on leadership and management instead. People in charge should...

Much of Gallup's employee engagement advice repackages decades old motivation techniques that may improve business performance...

The concept of leadership style is a usurper. It seized the territory once occupied by management style. It's time to give...