Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Stuff

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

What does it mean to be an executive and how does it differ from being a manager or a leader? By defining executive as a...

Leaders who want people to be fully engaged in their vision can't use the same influencing tactics as sales people, who are...

Engaged employees feel a strong sense of ownership, some for their jobs, but fewer for their department or the business as...

When we got fed up with managers in the 1980s we replaced them with leaders. Now that our patience is wearing thin with so-so...

Post-heroic management offers a model of selflessness in organizations to replace servant leadership, which has a core of...

A lot of people feel that leadership isn't a role but what does it mean exactly to reject this idea? Is there any sense to...