Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Stuff

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

A lot of people feel that leadership isn't a role but what does it mean exactly to reject this idea? Is there any sense to...

The concept of leadership style is a usurper. It seized the territory once occupied by management style. It's time to give...

Some organizations go to great lengths to engage employees, including creating a great place to work and offering a wider...

Leading by example is odd because it doesn’t fit standard leadership models. But analyzing how it works can radically...

To be effective, managers must do two things well: (1) achieve their targets and (2) make the best possible use of all resources....

Heroic leadership is out; post-heroic is in, but are we throwing the baby out with the bath water? Managers need to learn...