Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Stuff

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

Agreement is nearly universal that leadership can be learned. If leadership means being an executive, then there are clearly...

Despite valiant efforts to separate leadership from management, they remain entangled. Many equate them. Some  ignore...

A lot of people feel that leadership isn't a role but what does it mean exactly to reject this idea? Is there any sense to...

The myth that vision is required to lead people distorts the meaning of leadership and reveals our obsession with top level...

When we think about leadership we envisage being in charge of a group, not how to show leadership viewed as a discrete act....

Too many managers want their employees to be self-sufficient with minimal attention to keep them going. No wonder so many...